Abstract damage the bond between customer and seller

Abstract – Most of the studies about Psychological Contract Violation (PCV) adopt a employee – organization perspective. In this study we look at PCV from customer perspective. We apply the concept of PCV to perceived mutual obligations, and how such fulfilment of obligations or failure to fulfil those can make or break a customer – seller relationship.

 Keywords: Psychological contract violation, breach, customer, seller, trust, satisfactionI INTRODUCTION A customer-seller relationship comprises two key components: psychological and legal. A psychological contract can be defined as ‘an individual’s belief in mutual obligations between the person and another party’ (Rousseau & Tijoriwala, 1998). Psychological contracts are based on perceived promises and arise when one party is obligated to perform certain behaviour (Rousseau, 1995). From a customer’s perspective, psychological contracts comprise the customer’s perceptual beliefs about the seller’s contractual obligations.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

So customer’s individual perception of psychological contract violation (PCV) may occur if they think they are not getting what has been promised by a contractual agreement (Theotokis, Pramatari, & Tsiros, 2012). So, PCV damage the bond between customer and seller and has a negative impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty (Malhotra, Sahadev & Purani, 2017).II RESEARCH BACKGROUND While PCV has been studied mainly in the context of employee–organization relationships, Pavlou and Gefen (2005) examine PCV in customer–seller relationships. Every customer–seller interaction can be characterized by the psychological contract that features the customer’s perceptual beliefs about the seller’s contractual obligations, which may not be included in the formal legal terms of the exchange.III PCV – CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE In a customer – seller relationship the seller maintains certain expectations of customers which may or may not differ from those maintained by the customer. This forms the basis of psychological contracts. So a violation is often an emotional event due to frustration, anger, cheating by customer.

Perceptions differ from person to person and what one thinks as violation may not be perceived as violation by other.A. SOURCES OF PCVAccording to psychological contract theory, violations are inevitable in contractual relationships. A violation occurs when one party in a relationship perceives another to have failed to fulfil promised obligations.

Thus, in a customer – seller scenario, PCV occurs when customer thinks that seller’s failure has violated the psychological contract (Robinson & Morrison, 1997). Customers may perceive PCV even when the actual contract rules may have not been violated. PCV can also be caused by misunderstandings regarding the contractual obligations.According to Pavlou and Gefen the common sources of PCV are fraud, product misrepresentation, delivery delay, defaulting contracts, violating payment policy and product guarantees. They are not related and so the sources in isolation or in combination contributes to PCV.

B. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PCVPCV is rooted in two contributing factors: reneging and incongruence. Reneging is intentional failure to meet obligations.

It can be readily observable.  When a seller wilfully defaults a obligation such shipping a defective product, misrepresenting advertisements. This can be done by the seller for the purpose of cutting costs and reaping profits (Robinson & Morrison, 2000).Incongruence refers to perceived violation of psychological contract.

According to Morrison and Robinson (1997), three factors contribute to incongruence: ambiguity in terms of relationship, prior experiences, and lack of communication between customer and seller.