Democratic Pakistan seems to be this emerging political

   Democratic politics and civilian politicians were not flourished in
Pakistan where multi party system operating. The military of Pakistan no
tolerated the emergence of any independent power center that could create
threat to its internal autonomy and its dominance of both state and society.
The removal of successive civilian governments of Nawaz Sharif in October 1999
was a recent accident.   It is the nature
of Pakistani politics, there is now a consensus across the broad middle of the
political scenario that the basic problem in political system military no
accepts subordination to civilian authority. The politicians in Pakistan   encouraging the army to use undemocratic
means and methods for removal of civilian government.  The only silver lining to military rule in
Pakistan seems to be this emerging political agreement within the Alliance for
the Restoration of Democracy (ARD), comprising the mainstream political
parties, on the future contours of civil-military relations in Pakistan as
envisaged in the 1973 Constitution. But could this be a case of too little, too
late. The ARD, torn by factional rivalries and competing political interests,
remains largely ineffectual, as the regime has blocked all its efforts to
mobilize the public. Thus the mainstream parties remain leaderless and
marginalized despite the ARD, and are in no position to fill the widening void
in Pakistani politics. This political vacuum could give the bold and vocal
Islamic fundamentalist parties an opportunity to leverage public sentiment
against the United States and its ally Musharraf for maximum political
advantage. Many moderate Pakistanis, including their self appointed president,
consider that Islamic extremists have never been a significant force in
electoral politics. They also point to the deep political and personal
rivalries between the leaders of these groups. Others fear that the situation
at hand is slightly differed. In Pakistan, each military intervention has
created its own set of political distortions. As said (Leo Rose and D. Hugh
Evans wrote in these pages in 1997):

“The army’s wide political influence distorts the democratic
process. Earlier periods of military intervention created new political
divisions. Groups that found themselves benefited by authoritarian rule were
opposed by others, often linked to the mainstream political parties that were
sidelined or repressed. During these times, the army itself became an
increasingly powerful vested interest in society”

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

4.1 Impacts of 9/11 on Pakistani politics:

After the 9/11/2001 accident the Musharraf got decided to join
international collation against terrorism. 36 political parties rose against
the Musharraf decision and formed pak-Afghan defence council (PADC). This plate
form than changed Pakistan Defence Council (PDC). The six prominent religious
political parties meet on 17 June 2001. They decided that contest the next
general election under a common symbol and according of the Islamic ideology
council. The leader of the six religious political parties formed pre-electoral
alliance Mutahidda Mujlis e Amal (MMA) in the presidency of Shah Ahmad Norani.
These six religious parties sidelined their internal difference and
idealogy.the MMA contested general election 2002 under one symbol (Book) which
often public considered the holly book of Allah (Quran). The MMA leaders used
Mosque and madras’s for their political campaign.  In previous elections, any religious party or
its political alliance has not secured more than 10 seats in the National
Assembly, and therefore, the outstanding position of MMA should be considered
as a landmark event in Pakistan’s roller coaster political journey. The 2002
elections were held under the military government of Musharraf.                                                                                                                                                         
The domestic situation was also unusually favorable Islamists political
parties. President Musharraf had imposed governor’s rule in the KPK after
military takeover in 1999 and the 2002 general election was to be the first
general elections since 1997. Two secular political parties which had
traditionally been dominant in KPK politics one was Pakistan people’s party
(PPP) and another was the Pashtoon nationalist Awami National Party (ANP) were
weak, disassociated, and demoralized. The MMA alliance also benefited from
support by the state, which recognized that the Islamists could serve as a
useful tool by which the Musharraf government could control its chief political
rivals in the KPK. In 2002 general election. MMA won 45 general seats in
national assembly and 49 general seats in provincial assembly of KPK. The
Pakistani political system had mainly three horses: the Military, PML-Q and MMA