Economic growth Is considered as one of the most essential parts of the economics, and it Is defined an Increase of goods and services of a country within certain period (Guacamole, 2012).
Midis (2013) claimed that, this economic growth conception particularly relates to the growth of potential output and production which is measured by gross domestic product per capita (GAP). Economic growth Ideology has a long history, though It has been existed since the mold-18th, economic growth has dominated politics and policies since 1 945 worldwide (Kills et al, 2010). Indeed,Baleen et al (2012) mentioned that, economic growth conception merely exists in economics, and it is determined as the increase or development of goods, production, technology, and services, However, Rains et al (2000) noted that, economic growth theory also concerns ecology, environment, social and moral values, and therefore It causes swift increase of human well-being.
Due to mentioned controversial arguments for economic growth, the aim of this essay is to examine precisely the economic growth ideology and critically scrutinize it in terms of several aspects.This essay will argue about economic growth and It will reveal that, economic growth notion is the growth of output and income, increase of produced goods, rapid development of technology, and it is equally measured by GAP. Firstly, economic growth will be discussed in terms of economic aspect, it will reveal some limitations of GAP measurement such as exclusion of some economic activities (the costs of crime, growth of prisoners).In the next step, it will be examined from an environmental and ecological perspective and demonstrate some benefits for environment as well as preventing water scarcity with developed technology, some drawbacks for mankind such as air pollution and degradation of environment. In conclusion, on the basis of mentioned evidences, It will conclude that economic growth has slightly impact on the human well-being.Starting with the analysis of economic growth notion from an economic perspective, growth of Income and outcome, Increase of productivity and services, decrease of unemployment, monetary value of goods, and markedly increase of technology are leading issues, indicated by GAP.
The study of Berg et al (2009) reveals that, GAP is n estimate of market throughput, equally measurement of output and Income, and produced goods both by foreign and local companies.Rent et al (2012) claimed that, economic growth lead to the increase of economic force of state, as it increases production, develop technology and reduce unemployment. In order to increase economic force of state, the governments try to apply valuable economic system in countries (Ibid). Marx (1858, cited by Ex., 2010: 20) who was first person stated capitalism term in economics, showed that capitalists were subject to an inevitable growth imperative. As, there is a competition among capitalists that is defined each individual capitalist increase his profit, and therefore nowadays capitalism system dominate worldwide.
Furthermore, Stanza et al (2009) mentioned that, economic growth doe not only lead to high rate of employment or Increase of output, but also It causes higher tax revenues for the government, thus it favors strength to government 1 OFF sum up, it seems that economic growth ideology impact on country ‘s economy, particularly it causes the increase of economic force of state. However, certain scholars argue that economic growth also lead to people ‘s economic welfare that is called human well-being, at the same time it is measured by GAP.Firstly, According to McDonald et al (2010), human well-being conception relates to the quality of people ‘s life, their education and health quality.
Shin (1978, cited by Ex., 2010: 21) reported that, many academics of different parts of the world appeared the importance of economic growth for human well-being as well. Similarly, Wang et al (2001) emphasized that, economic growth play a significant role in human welfare due to rise of people ‘s wages. Apart from these, Haggier et al (2003, cited by Ex., 2010: 22) emphasized that, economic growth is a basic factor that influence on human well-being.For instance, when a country ‘s output and income is poor, population cannot afford their needs (high-quality life style, e. G. Education, health), consequently, they suffer from lack of happiness.
Therefore, Shin ‘s study concluded that, economic growth concerns to human welfare, as Haggier mentioned, increasing income raise people ‘s happiness. Nevertheless, although some scholars show that economic growth causes an increase of human well-being, Stanza et al (2009) claimed that, when a country’s population s extremely great, government cannot cope with provide population ‘s needs regardless of considerably economic growth.Additionally, Kohl (2004) stated that, there are many vital economic activities are completely excluded from GAP measurements as well as the costs of crime, growth of prisoners, volunteer work, and reduce of natural resources. According to Berg et al (2009), GAP is an estimate or measurement of economic growth, as some essential economic activities are excluded from GAP measurement, they are not necessarily lead to economic growth notion.Indeed, Haggier et al mentioned reasonable arguments that economic growth also causes human welfare, however arguments of Stanza et al prove that economic growth slightly lead to human well-being.
Hence, it can be concluded that economic growth especially causes the growth in state ‘s economical force, it does not necessarily impact on human welfare. Turning to the role of economic growth from an environmental and ecological point of view, many arguments which argue about positive effects were mentioned by theorists and ecologists.One of them was claimed by Wallace et al (2008), higher reduction and developed, high-quality technology play a considerable role for environment and ecology. Simultaneously, Ex. (2010: 21) mentioned that, modern technologies which are established due to economic growth are used in order to settle some ecological problems. According to the study of Wallace et al (2007), For instance; there are many arid areas in different parts of the world suffer from lack of water shortage. Modern production and recently invented technological installation are valuable to overcome these nature challenges.
Furthermore, Fusion (2010:11-13) dated that, though there was water scarcity in Northern China a few years ago, several kinds of modern technology were brought to China and now they are used to Whereas, definite scholars consider that economic growth appear many negative impacts in terms of environmental which causes harms for people, and this circumstance is considered as weakening of human well-being. Saboteur (1996: 1) reported that, according to some environmentalists and ecological economists, economic growth lead to degradation of the environment.Moreover, the same argument was claimed Warren et al (2001).
Technologies develop swiftly and increase its kinds, this progress causes air pollution, and therefore world population suffer from lack of clean air. Additionally, CIA (2008: 1) emphasized that, developed technologies and higher production cause the destruction of green areas, meadows are reduced. As a result of this issue, Warren et al (2001) noted that the degradation of environment is a basic source of human health. As green areas reduce significantly, some leading diseases form in society.Apart from all these Saboteur (1996: 3) stated that, although developed technology save people’s time and lessen heir physical labor, this position make them lazy and unhealthy. Cal, X.
(2008). Water stress, water transfer and social equity in Northern China ? Implications for policy reforms. Journal of Environmental Management. USA. Volume 87, Issue 1. Warren, R. F.
And Collie, R. N. (2001). The transport sector as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric Environment Journal. Volume 35, Issue 9.
I-J Wallace, J. And Cornelius, N. (2007). E-technology and the emergent e-environment: Implications for organizational form and function.
The Journal of High Technology Management Research. Volume 18, Issue 1. UK Chaw, C. S. And Limit, P. C. (2008). Rethinking classroom-oriented instructional development models to mediate instructional planning in technology-enhanced learning environments.
Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 24, Issue 8. Australia. Kills, G. And Schneider, F. (2010).
Crisis or opportunity? Economic outgrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 18, Issue 6. Spain. Guacamole, D. (2012).
Introduction to economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory. Volume 147, Issue 2.The USA. Mood’s, T.
(2013). Long-term GAP forecasts and the prospects for growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Switzerland.
Psychology. Volume 30, Issue 2. Spain. McDonald, B. D. And Miller, D.
R. (2010). Welfare programs and the state economy. Journal of Policy Modeling. Volume 32, Issue 6. USA. Stanza, R.
And Hart, M. (2009). Beyond GAP: The Need for New Measures of Progress. USA: Boston University.
Rent, A. And Wall, M. (2012). Economic growth and decline in mortality in developing countries: An analysis of the World Bank development datasets. Public Health Journal. London Fusion, K. (2010).Sustainability in Food and Water.
An Asian Perspective. Japan: University of Tokyo. Wang, J. And Kiang. N. Y.
(2001). Attitude choice, economic change, and welfare. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
Volume 45, Issue 3. Singapore. Saboteur, H. (1996).
Global environment and technology of plasticity: role of technology of plasticity in addressing global environmental issues. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Volume 59, Issue 3. Japan. Ixia, Y. And Www, S.
(2013). Promoting electronic ability of microbes with negative pressure. Journal of Power Sources.
Volume 229, Pages 79-83. China: Human University.