On not military based places. Both Hiroshima and

On August 6, 1945 there was a bomb dropped on Hiroshima by the United States. The attack smoothed Hiroshima city and a large number of the Japanese individuals died in this terrible occasion. Prior to the Japanese could understand what had happened, the US made another huge attack on Nagasaki.

Three days later the United States dropped a second bomb on after Japan did not surrender. From a military perspective, the nuclear bombs could have been avoided if the United States had endeavored to speak with the government of Japan about the matter of peace negotiations. This is why the U.S. was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan because of the locations that were bombed killed thousands of guiltless civilians, the terms of the Potsdam Declaration, and the economy had been defeated and weakened already.First of all, the bombings were unjustified because of the locations where the bombs were dropped. Neither cities were military or naval bases. Hiroshima is an important army depot and port of embarkation in the middle of an urban industrial area.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Japan had several cities that had several military positions but were not bases. They were cities that had women and children living in them, which had killed many. Hiroshima was an army depot which only stored supplies for the military and an embarkation that was a place to where airplanes would come and load passengers and depart.

Truman was the one who told the Secretary of War to use the bombs. Truman quoted in his diary that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children. The status of their targets showed that all of their targets were big cities in urban industrial areas. They had military depots or port embarkations but were not military based places. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were highly populated leading to high casualty levels.

An estimate of 160,000 people in Hiroshima and over 100,000 people in Nagasaki. The decision in dropping the bomb on two cities lead to “the maiming and in the death of thousands of defenseless men, women, and children.” Eighty percent of the cities infrastructures had been severely damaged and many civilians had no choice but to endure through starvation. The United States did not focus on the Japanese government, they focused on the guiltless individuals who did nothing incorrectly. Truman quote on his decision to drop the bomb that dropping the bombs ended the war, saved lives, and gave the free nations a chance to face the facts. In any case, the activities of the United States can be reprimanded as the reality remains that it was a demonstration of savage demolition that focused purposely at huge number of city tenants who had positively no association in the atrocities of Japan.

In spite of the fact that the nuclear bombs immediately finished World War Two, the repercussions were excessively appalling as the innocuous regular citizens were fiercely killed, the ensuing radiation made the urban areas dirtied and polluted the urban communities for quite a while. Hence, the dropping of the bombs was fairly a mass slaughtering of the honest Japanese regular folks and certainly was conflicting approach to end World War Two.has sickened the hearts of every civilized man and woman, and has profoundly shocked the conscience of humanity. Not only that, continuing on, the bombing of Japan was also unnecessary due to the unacceptable terms of the Potsdam Declaration. Potsdam Proclamation was issued by the leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom and China on July 26, 1945. This set out the terms for “the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces.

” The Japanese were known for having a strong tradition due to having many military depots and embarkation all over their cities which meant they had a high military honor. This term of unconditional surrender of all armed forces was difficult, almost impossible for Japan to accept as it would be a disgrace to disassemble their army. The unconditional surrender as well stated that Japan would have to overthrow their Emperor. It is important to recall that the Japanese people revered the Emperor as a living god.

Due to the terms that did not comply with the Japanese that is what caused them not to surrendered. Another clause Potsdam Declaration stated Article 12 of Potsdam Proclamation that the “occupying forces of the Allies shall be with drawn from Japan. The Japanese considered this to be an unbelievable affront to their ruler, and in this way declined surrender. The only reason why America could follow through with the term was because Japan would face “prompt and utter destruction.” This made the terms of the Potsdam Declaration completely disgraceful and unacceptable for Japan. The japanese desired to surrender if they could retain the Emperor and the constitution as a basis for maintaining discipline and order in Japan after the devastating news of surrender became known to the Japanese people. If the U.

S. revised its treaty terms in order to keep emperor in power and leave at least some of the Japanese military intact, Japan would have likely surrendered quicker and the bombs wouldn’t have to be needed. Additionally, Japan was likewise as of now looking at surrendering, they were simply attempting to get an approach to surrender without unrestricted surrender. The third, and final why the bombings were not necessary as both Japan’s military and economy had been defeated and weakened already. There were many people that said we should have dropped the bomb because by dropping it would end the war, save lives. In reality we shouldn’t have dropped the bombs because the bombs were not necessary since the beginning. Japan had insufficient resources to start a war.

This is how we knew Japan sooner or later was going to surrender because they would not be able to withstand a much larger and powerful nation than them. Dwight Eisenhower disagreed that the bombing was to save lives and to end the war. Eisenhower agreed that the bombings were completely unnecessary. “I voiced my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated…no longer as a measure to save American lives… It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of “face”.” Admiral Ernest King thought that it was not necessary to bomb Japan because ” for had we been willing to wait, the effective naval blockade would.

..have starved the Japanese into submission through lack of oil, rice…and other essential materials. Even before the bombings, the Japanese cities’ infrastructure had been severely damaged and many civilians had no choice but to endure through starvation.

The United States had different options than to bomb Japan all in one instant. The japaneses economy was going downhill already and nothing was going to stop it. Even before the bombings, many Japanese areas were being destroyed. Along with the continuous air raids, the sea blockade also left Japan’s economy in decline. Another reason was one of the issues impeding Japan’s surrender was its badly divided government. A bad divided government means less power to the nation, powers and decisions are divided and usually each side has to give up something so that both sides can agree on something.

Joseph Grew talked with the president on May 28th and the United States knew that Japan was already a defeated Nation. Even though the United States knew that Japan was defeated they still bomb them. Japanese leaders to responsible Americans after the American occupation, it is quite clear that the civilian advisors to the emperor were working towards surrender long before the Potsdam Proclamation. They knew then that Japan was a vanquished Nation. From a military angle, the nuclear bombs could have been avertible if the United States had endeavored to speak with the administration of Japan about the matter of peace negotiations. Japan was not prepared for the war, the bombs were unneeded to end the war. A bombing survey was made prior to November 1, 1945 that “Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.”At the point when the nuclear bomb was dropped it caused such huge numbers of Japanese setbacks, that weren’t simply men yet ladies and kids also.

I understand that Japan was the adversary who were in charge of such huge numbers of American losses at Pearl Harbor, yet dropping a bomb on them sort of goes excessively far. Particularly in light of the fact that there shouldn’t be a sufficient motivation to simply drop a bomb on individuals to demonstrate them we recognize what we’re doing as such don’t upset us. For Truman to try and recommend this would just put us as war much more at war with Japan and we wouldn’t be near coming to peace with them. I understand that he was endeavoring to retaliate for the lives lost at Pearl Harbor yet that doesn’t give him or anybody the privilege to simply execute blameless individuals. So generally the nuclear bomb was not a vital weapon that should have been utilized on Japan.