There First World War and never got the

is no doubt that war is evil. It brings relentless bloodshed,
destruction and death amongst people and nations. It is without a
doubt one of the worst disasters to befall humans. People on both
sides dying for their country, sometimes willingly and other times
forced. War can be heroic, noble and even dignifying, however people
still come home internally scarred. The memories of what they saw and
did are often too difficult to endure.

Brooke the writer of “The Soldier” is considered a war poet, he
died early in the First World War and never got the chance to write
about the reality of war. “The Soldier” resides in an early phase
of the war, a time where people were much more optimistic and
patriotic. By that it reflects the honor and pride that shined over
the English men who entered the war in the early stages of the
conflict. The poem takes the form of the typical English sonnet also
used by William Shakespeare which is highly visible with the use of
the ending rhyme “ababcdcd” in the first eight lines. There is no
denying the patriotic message within the poem, noticeable in its
repeated mention of “England” and “English” which is
mentioned 6 times. When we take a closer look at the poem we unfold
subtle hints of its patriotism such as “Foreign field” already in
the second line. It shows us that even though English soldiers may
die in the fields of France the pride and courage taken with them
will last forever.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Et Decorum Est is a poem written by Wilfred Owen following his
experiences fighting in the harsh battles of France during World War
One. The Latin name chosen by the young soldier means “It is sweet
and honorable”.The vivid imagery and searing tone of the poem
reminds the reader of the unforgettable horrors of World War One. The
poem uses a double sonnet. There are 28 lines in total, and many
lines are in iambic pentameter with end rhymes. But during his work
he decided against this form as seen that all four stanzas are
unequal. He starts of by narrating the action from a present form
with similes such as “Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
knock-kneed, coughing like hags,”. In the first sonnet, Wilfred
Owen narrates the action in present form, while in the second he sees
it from a bird’s view. In the second stanza, Owen explains the
attack. As gas shells begin to fall and the soldiers rush to put on
their masks a clumsy soldier drops his mask and start “Yelling out
and stumbling”. The image of the man “guttering, Choking,
drowning” just because he failed to put on his mask in time helps
the reader understand the horror of combat. In the final stanza, Owen
writes that if the readers could see the dead bodies, they would stop
sending young men to war. They would stop feeding their children old
lies of how “sweet and honorable it is, to die for the fatherland.”

Brooke’s “The soldier” and Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce Et Decorum
Est” indicates that there is more than one aspect of war. In “The
soldier” Rupert Brooke reveals what an honor it would be to die for
his country. Unlike “Dulce Et Decorum Est”, “The soldier”
does not transfer the feelings of horror and death that comes with
war. Instead it’s shying away from realism and truth. When it was
published in the initial stages of the war, people needed faith and
faith is what they got. It made war seem like it was not so
atrocious. It’s if “The soldier” wants the soldiers to accept
death and be proud of dying British because there will be “some
corner of foreign field, that is forever England”. In Wilfred
Owen’s war poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” he shows the horrible
incidents of war as the men are gassed and forced to see their
comrades die. The narrator of the poem goes on to explain that “in
all my dreams, before my helpless sight, he plunges at me, guttering,
choking, drowning”. He will never forget the horrendous experiences
of actual combat. He is talking from a different aspect of the war,
he was in combat. While Rupert Brooke was not.

is not all evil and with war comes peace. Before you reach the point
of peace one must fight. It can be gruesome, awful and even
terrifying but fighting for your country is probably one of the most
honorable achievements one can achieve. Knowing that you are the one
keeping your friends, family and loved ones safe can give you peace.
Feeling like you are fighting an endless battle seeing your comrades
being slaughtered or killing the enemy takes its toll on someone.
Each poem is glorifying the opposite side of the same story. It is
honorable to fight for your country, but it is certainly also a
nightmare no one wants to be in. I would not say that one poem is a
more accurate rendering of war, but one is without a doubt more
realistic while the other is a more optimistic view on an seemingly
endless war.